![]() Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”. Ĭardoso P, Pekár S, Jocqué R, Coddington JA (2011) Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders. Ĭardoso P, Silva I, Oliveira NG, Serrano ARM (2004) Indicator taxa of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Am Midland Natur 111(1):165–172Ĭandiani DF, Indicatti RP, Brescovit AD (2005) Composição e diversidae da araneofauna (Araneae) de serapilheira em três florestas urbanas na cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires, p 587īultman TL, Uetz GW (1984) Effect of structure and nutritional quality of litter on abundances of litter-dwelling arthropods. īrown AD, Martínez-Ortíz U, Acerbi M, Corcuera J (2006) La situación ambiental argentina 2005. ![]() AMBIO A J Human Environ 37(2):114–118īrazil TK, Almeida-Silva LM, Pinto-Leite CM, Lira-da-Silva RM, Lima Peres MC, Brescovit AD (2005) Aranhas sinantrópicas em três bairros da cidade de Salvador, Bahia, Brasil (Arachnida, Araneae). īortolus A (2008) Error cascades in the biological sciences: the unwanted consequences of using bad taxonomy in ecology. Īronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NSG, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Kooijmans JL, Kuhn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mortberg U, Pysek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Īrgañaraz CI, Gleiser RM (2017) Does urbanization have positive or negative effects on Crab spider (Araneae: thomisidae) diversity? Zoologia 34(e19987):1–8. Īnderson M (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Īlberti M, Correa C, Marzluff JM, Hendry AP, Palkovacs EP, Gotanda KM, Hunt VM, Apgar TM, Zhou Y (2017) Global urban signatures of phenotypic change in animal and plant populations. Īlberti M (2005) The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. In addition, Salticidae richness can predict 74% of the total spider richness recorded and may be used as spider diversity bio-indicators in this climatic region.Īlaruikka D, Kotze DJ, Matveinen K, Niemelä J (2002) Carabid beetle and spider assemblages along a forested urban–rural gradient in southern Finland. Results indicate that on urban green spaces a low impervious surface cover, a coverage of trees, herbaceous vegetation and a vertical structure of vegetation at least up to 1 m in height contribute to higher richness and abundance of spiders, Salticidae being more sensitive than the overall spider community to local effects. Species composition moderately differed between urban and exurban sites. Overall, the exurban was richer than the urban habitat, however, at the site level Salticidae richness and abundance (but not the total spider assemblage) were significantly lower in urban sites. Spiders were sampled with a G-VAC (aspirator) in urban green patches in Córdoba city, Argentina, in urban, suburban and exurban habitats (18 sites six per habitat) and local and landscape traits were assessed. We also assess whether Salticidae could be an indicator group for the broader spider community in the urban environment. Effects of habitat, landscape type and structure and local characteristics on spider species composition, richness and relative abundance were evaluated in urban green patches in a temperate city of South America. Studies in urban environments frequently focus on ground-dwelling spiders or on spiders in built structures, leaving aside foliage spiders. Spiders are top predators, often considered to be sensitive to habitat alteration. ![]() Urbanization and urban landscape characteristics greatly alter plant and animal species richness and abundances in negative and positive directions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |